DEJA-VU, MALAYSIA BACK ON THE ROAD TO DICTATORSHIP AGAIN? - WHEN 'PEL****' & 'T** K*****' ARE TABOO - BUT WHO DECIDES WHAT NEWS IS 'MISLEADING OR INACCURATE OR DISRESPECTFUL?'
DEJA-VU, MALAYSIA BACK ON THE ROAD TO DICTATORSHIP AGAIN? - WHEN 'PEL****' & 'T** K*****' ARE TABOO - BUT WHO DECIDES WHAT NEWS IS 'MISLEADING OR INACCURATE OR DISRESPECTFUL?'
KUALA LUMPUR (Politics Now!) - In a sign of how fearful the Anwar Ibrahim government may be of losing power, blind loyalists in the Communications ministry helmed by PKR's Fahmi Fadzil and DAP's Teo Nie Ching may have overextended their hand.
If the two ministers refuse to do anything to stop the oppressive trend and methods being used to 'safeguard' Anwar's position, then Malaysia is well on the way to becoming a dictatorship all over again.
“Who decides what news is misleading or inaccurate or disrespectful? To allow the government to decide this would set us on the road to dictatorship,” Nabila Khairuddin, coordinator of watchdog group Lawyers for Liberty, said in a statement.
Indeed as minister and deputy minister respectively, the buck stops with Fahmi and Nie Ching and they should take rap if the Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), which is directly under their control, starts to ignore the law to justify ham-fisted actions to muzzle critics.
“For MCMC to arbitrarily talk of restricting ‘disrespectful’ or ‘misleading’ news shows a complete lack of regard for the law and lack of respect for the Constitution," said Nabila.
In a move that critics say reeked of hypocrisy or was perhaps a blatant play by certain quarters to curry favor with Anwar, the MCMC had tried to defend itself from rising public outrage. It called on the press to practice responsible journalism and not spread “manipulative content”.
According to Nabila, the MCMC had used whimsical excuses to justify past enforcement of the law for content that were deemed in the MCMC’s own words, “disrespectful and divisive”, “manipulative”, “misleading” and “disinformation”.
In case it has escaped Fahmi and Nie Ching's notice, this itself is a threat to freedom of expression and in violation of Article 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution, warned Nabila.
“That right can only be restricted as provided by the law to the necessary extent as stated in Article 10(2)(a) such as in the interests of security, public order, or morality,” she said.
Comments